|
|
DMJ Business of Medicine
Archives
|
| The 80th Texas Legislature:
Important healthcare bills passed
|
Bryan K. White
DCMS director of medical economics & quality |
The 80th Texas Legislature adjourned on May 28 after
passing only 1480 bills out of the 6190 bills introduced (not that this
necessarily is a bad thing). Health care was a hot topic during the
session, and many bills focused on technology, Medicaid, and cost transparency
in the medical marketplace. Here are a few bills that affect the business
of medicine and the practicing physician.
Technology
The session had a strong focus on promoting technological advancement
throughout the practice of medicine. House Bill 522, effective immediately,
encourages the development of a patient identification card pilot program.
This bill requires the Texas Department of Insurance to create a technical
advisory committee to make recommendations for a pilot program, set
to begin May 1, as well as the identification card program. The committee
will be comprised of physicians, hospitals, health plans, and consumers.
This program is a solid first step toward requiring health plans to
adopt real-time claims adjudication and eligibility. This could mean
no more confusion over a patient’s benefit set or eligibility,
and no more timely claims repricing processes.
HB 1066 takes affect Sept 1 and allows more physicians
to voluntarily share data electronically. This will be promoted by the
Texas Health Services Authority Corp through new information technology
functions. This entity will create incentives to encourage physician
involvement in the secure exchange of health information. This will
make retrieving patient information much easier and more efficient.
Real-time claims adjudication becomes a reality with this system, as
well.
Medicaid
Medicaid patients and the physicians who treat them received quite a
bit of attention this session. A number of bills vied to increase access
to patients while rewarding physicians with higher payments and more
incentives.
Senate Bill 10 creates additional tools to control
spending and improve public health. The bill offers new products to
Medicaid enrollees such as voluntary health savings accounts and incentives
for living healthier lives. The health savings account could mean a
change in the way Medicaid physicians collect money from patients while
the incentives for the healthy lifestyle aim to decrease the expenditure
of Medicaid dollars.
Two amendments to SB 10 that can have a tremendous
positive effect on a physician’s practice are HB 2610 and HB 3471.
Both focus on the implementation of information technology into the
Medicaid program. HB 3471 creates a pilot program to provide health
information technology, including electronic health records, to high-volume
primary care physicians who participate in Medicaid.
Other strong positives from this session include bills
that will increase enrollment in the Children’s Health Insurance
Program by relieving some burdens that parents face when enrolling their
children.
Physician reimbursement is looking up after the 80th
session, as well. HB 1 increases physician payment for treating patients
under children’s Medicaid by 25% and adult Medicaid by 10%. The
Legislature also agreed to update Medicate Relative Value Units (RVUs)
which hasn’t been done since 1993.
Contracting and Transparency
HB 1594 requires that a health plan considers as in-network a physician
who joins a medical group that already is under contract as a network
provider, while the new physician’s application is in process.
This bill is effective Sept 1.
One buzzword that pops up in every healthcare reformation
debate is “transparency.” The Legislature tackled this idea
by passing SB 1731, which gives patients and employers access to healthcare
cost information from the physician, hospital, other providers, and
health insurers. This includes copayment amounts, deductibles, and all
other out-of-pocket expenses. It is effective Sept 1.
Among the bills that didn’t pass were a few
dealing with physicians disclosing network affiliation and balance billing
information to patients. Those bills would have limited the ability
of the physician to collect the balance owed by the patient for out-of-network
services. If the physician is not allowed to bill the patient for the
portion not paid by health plans, then health plans would not need to
contract with any physician. The failure of these bills is a large victory
for Texas medicine.
Not every healthcare bill passed in the 80th session
will significantly impact the practice environment, but some will serve
as precusors of what is to come in the next few years.
 |