|
DMJ Computing Care
Archives |
| Doctors test robotic surgeon
for laparoscopy
|
by Russell Rian
UT Southwestern writer |
Having a surgeon with four arms is one advantage of
the latest robotic technology being studied at UT Southwestern Medical
Center.
The $1.4 million robot named da Vinci can hold a camera
in one hand while manipulating tiny laparoscopic surgical tools in its
other hands. And it never tires like its human counterparts.
With a human surgeon at the controls, da Vinci filters
out tremor, enhances precision, offers three-dimensional imaging, and
eliminates the inverted manipulation of instruments usually required
in laparoscopic procedures.
“The catch phrase is ‘more precise than
humanly possible.’ That’s the rationale for this technology,”
said Daniel Scott, MD, FACS, director of the Southwestern Center for
Minimally Invasive Surgery and assistant professor of surgery at UT
Southwestern.
Although testing the four-armed robot is ongoing,
Dr Scott said, “It seems advantageous from the standpoint of precision
for some procedures.”
Da Vinci is most popular in urology for that reason,
especially for prostate operations. It’s also proved useful in
surgeries on the esophagus and stomach. Researchers are investigating
its practicality for cardiac surgery, such as coronary artery bypass
grafting and valve replacement.
“It may well prove useful for general surgery
procedures that have traditionally required open incisions, like biliary
reconstruction or pancreatic surgery,” Dr Scott said.
Laparoscopic surgeries, also called minimally invasive
surgeries, are performed via several tiny holes rather than one long
incision, reducing post-operative pain and recovery times. The method
is increasingly popular.
The first robotic surgery, performed in 1995, relieved
the need for an assistant to hold the camera during laparoscopic procedures.
Da Vinci represents the next step, offering an instrument that actually
performs the surgery based on controls handled by the surgeon.
“It’s not difficult to learn,” Dr
Scott said. But it does take longer to set up, mostly to position the
robot. “It takes choreography,” Dr Scott explained.
The robot also is expensive and cumbersome, which
limits the operative field and can make it impractical for exploratory
surgeries or surgeries that require surgeons to go in more than one
area.
Surgeons are still discovering its full potential.
But to be successful, Dr Scott added, “It needs to supersede laparoscopy
in terms of efficiency before the average surgeon is going to use it.
But as this technology continues to evolve, no doubt it will be miniaturized.
Smaller is going to be better.”
Automation also may be in the future, with a physician
pointing to sections of tissue that need suturing and the robot doing
it. That potentially could be integrated with computed tomography or
magnetic resonance imaging scans, which could offer opportunities for
dress rehearsals of procedures.
Another potential for the technology is for telerobotic
surgery across distances - physicians in one city using the robot (to
perform an operation) in another city. The first test of such a surgery
was a successful trans-Atlantic gallbladder procedure, with the surgeon
in New York and the patient in France.
“It certainly could have applications for rural
surgery or mentoring surgeons in the community on new procedures,”
Dr Scott said.
“There are big permutations for the future of
surgery, and that’s why we need to be leaders in this field as
a medical school and as a center dedicated to minimally invasive surgery,”
he said. “We have a strong track record of embracing robotics
and research into this new type of technology here, and we look forward
to continuing those activities with this new acquisition.”
 |